Lindsey Graham Is The Defense Industry's Man

South Carolina's senior senator, Lindsey Graham, loves the "War on Terror". He told Fox and Friends this morning that he's "glad" Verizon is turning over to the NSA phone records of average Americans:

I’m glad the NSA is trying to find out what the terrorists are up to overseas and in our country...I’m a Verizon customer. I don’t mind Verizon turning over records to the government if the government is going to make sure that they try to match up a known terrorist phone with somebody in the United States. I don’t think you’re talking to the terrorists. I know you’re not. I know I’m not. So we don’t have anything to worry about.

Senator Graham vehemently defends his favorite war. After learning that Rand Paul called the Verizon/NSA partnership a "an astounding assault on the Constitution", Senator Graham took to attacking libertarians:

Sen. Rand Paul, he's a libertarian, and in Rand Paul's world you have almost no defenses against terrorists...I see the threat to our nation differently.

Indeed he does. Graham continues to support nearly every federal "War on Terror" initiative--no matter how invasive--, even though the erosion of civil liberties has become a "hot topic" among conservatives. Perhaps one can better understand why he's such a strong advocate of controversial defense programs by looking at his top campaign contributors. From OpenSecrets:

4 of Graham's top 5 contributors from 2007 to 2012 have profited greatly from the senator's favorite war. SCANA is a major Department of Defense supplier. Nelson Mullins, et al. is a law firm that specializes in DoD procurement contracts. Motley Rice, LLC is a law firm that specializes in "War on Terror" litigation. And Boeing is one of the nation's largest DoD vendors.

Seth Mason, Charleston SC

Tremendous Opportunity For Libertarian Talk Radio

I previously noted that the demand for libertarian terrestrial talk radio is increasing, and the supply of libertarian hosts on terrestrial talk radio is far lower than demand. Today, I've come across additional data that suggest that libertarian talk radio has great potential.

Terrestrial music radio is hemorrhaging listeners, and many under-performing music stations are switching to the relatively-more popular news/talk format. In other words, the demand for news/talk programming is increasing.

While demand for news/talk programming is increasing, terrestrial news/talk radio as a whole, which is currently dominated by conservative hosts, is losing listeners. According to RadioInsights, more than half of news/talk stations lost market share in each of the last 3 years. News/talk listenership has been flat for years: the format has approximately the same number of listeners today as it had in 2007.

The conservative-dominated terrestrial news/talk format also has a less-than-optimal distribution of listeners by age group. According to Arbitron, listeners of the format are getting older, and the majority already age out of the key 25-54 demographic:

The majority of libertarians, on the other hand, are young--and therefore more valuable--to advertisers.
  
Libertarian talk has great potential in the online format as well as on terrestrial radio. While terrestrial radio is losing listeners, Internet radio is rapidly gaining listeners, and the number of listeners of online radio is expected to equal that of terrestrial radio in the next few years. The online talk radio format is better suited to libertarians than conservatives, as the former tend to be younger and more tech-savvy than the latter.

Seth Mason, Charleston SC